!

Sunday, September 8, 2013

BEOWULF ESSAY

     Throughout history there have been terrific stories about dauntless heroes that devote their lives to fighting evil. These heroes have been rather similar throughout time. Two exemplary heroes are Beowulf and Thor. Both are heroes of a different time period yet they still have the same impact on their respective societies. These two heroes both bear extreme strength and for it, they are very apotheosized by other citizens. They are traditional heroes in the sense that they fight evil and promote the greater good and both heroes even have similar intentions but Thor is sometimes fighting more for himself than for other purposes. Beowulf comes from a great line of royalty so his heroism is upholding his position in society. Thor is trying to become King so he is working to establish himself as a strong warrior. Thor is so obsessed with using his heroism to gain a greater position and Beowulf is simply being a hero because he feels that it is his position.

     The similarities between these two heroes are vast. Both are looked upon as gods. In the epic, Beowulf is greeted with an effusive welcome when he comes to kill Grendel. The people worship him because he is able to kill a monster that terrorized them for so long. Thor, as the son of the king, also has great prestige. His strength and supernatural abilities make him redoubtable and revered. This characterization of the two heroes puts them above ordinary citizens. They are aggrandized and set apart from the rest of their society and are expected to take on different, more brutal responsibilities. A hero is not a hero without an enemy. Antagonists like Grendel and Laufey present the dichotomy between right and wrong and good and evil. Beowulf fights an epic battle with Grendel and Thor takes down the Frost Giants that invade his kingdom.These conflicts demonstrate the power and strength of our heroes. A sense of pride is evident in both heroes. Beowulf admits that because Grendel fights with no weapons, he will also fight using solely his hands. Beowulf knows that he is a great hero and he enjoys it. Thor is prideful as well. He ignores his father's orders not to fight because he thinks he smarter than his father. Beowulf's pride will eventually cause him to lose his life in a fight with the dragon and Thor's pride gets him exiled from his kingdom. The irony in both stories shows that the heroes do have their flaws. Thor is a great warrior who has devoted his life to fighting evil, yet he gets so easily distracted by a girl and strays from his path. Beowulf is esteemed and loved yet in a battle with the dragon, nearly all of his men abandon him.

     These heroes have some significant differences as well. The heroes obviously come from different times. Certain jargon used in the stories show the different settings. In Beowulf, there are allusions to the bible and this demonstrates to the audience the kind of society that Beowulf came from. In his time, bravery and strength were ideal characteristics. Thor's setting is outer worldly. It's completely fictional and Thor faces a much different society than Beowulf. Thor, coming from his family, was a contestant to be the next king and his life centered around achieving that goal. Thor is expected to be leader whereas Beowulf is just expected to use his blunt force to ward off evil. The conflicts presented in the stories also symbolizes differences between the two characters. In his conflict with Grendel, Beowulf uses nothing but bravado and his pure strength. In Thor's conflicts, he would be fairly powerless without his hammer. Beowulf doesn't rely on special, signature weapons like Thor does. These differences all circle back to their time periods. Thor's heroism is in pursuit of his coveted role as King. Beowulf's bravery is simply his personality that has been deemed admirable by the standards of his time.

     Beowulf and Thor at first glance are very similar heroes. They fight evil, hold prominent positions in society, and are tremendously brave They also have their flaws and have purposes for their bravery, but looking closer, it is evident that they aren't as similar as they seem. Their respective time periods model those differences. Thor was using his bravery to become king. Beowulf was doing what society expected him to do in his role as hero. Our two heroes handle conflicts differently and their settings affect this. Both are heroes that fight evils but they view the world differently.

9 comments:

  1. Very nice literary devices that I don't commonly see; your textual examples and comparisons never seem jumpy or "back-and-forth" because it flows smoothly. The only good suggestion I can think of is to capitalize the Bible in the third paragraph (when I was forced to go to CCD, they were really touchy about the capitalization of the Bible).

    ReplyDelete
  2. This essay is very nicely written! You made a lot of great points and the essay as a whole just flows perfectly. Something I may suggest would just be to use more evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think you did an amazing job on your essay! I really like the examples you used also.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nice work, Becca! I think that your comparisons were spot on and unique in the sense that nobody seemed to compare Thor to Beowulf. Your use of vocabulary was excellent as well. The only only suggestion I would make would be to maybe add some quotes for concrete textural evidence. Overall, very nice!

    ReplyDelete
  5. This essay is amazing and shows excellent comparisons between both Beowulf and Thor! I thought it was great that you used recent vocabulary words such as bravado, but I would suggest the addition of textural evidence in order to make your point stronger like Rachel said above.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Your essay was very well put together. As always it sounded very sophisticated. The examples you used were perfect, although a few more could never hurt.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I love your use of vocabulary and it doesn't seem forced. The sentences and examples you use flow nicely and you make smart points with evidence!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Rebecca, your essay was extremely well organized. The only sentence that was a little awkward to read was the third sentence in your last paragraph. You could consider rephrasing it into something like, "Also, they both have flaws and motives behind their bravery,..." to make your conclusion more clear and powerful. The rest of your essay was well written, and I could tell that you did some extensive planning before writing it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Rebecca, you've done a great job overall and I agree with the comments above. In the third paragraph you might consider differentiating the writing techniques from the cultural influences, but in general you hit all the right notes. Well-done!

    ReplyDelete